Executive Leadership Styles: Deciding on Your Mode of Command

Do you know what your leadership style is? If not, it’s time to figure it out. In this blog post, we will discuss the different leadership styles and how you can decide which one suits your needs best. This article will be a great resource for those looking to become a more effective leader in their business.

Here are six leadership styles to help you understand your working style better:

1. Achiever Leadership

This leadership style is most common in leaders who are driven by success. Achiever leadership typically sees heavy focus on the bottom line numbers and employees’ performance will be constantly monitored to make sure they are hitting their goals.

Achiever leadership can help drive an organization forward, but it does come at a cost. Employees may feel stressed and they may not be allowed to take time off for any personal issues.

Achiever leadership is best used in environments with strict deadlines or where there are extensive business goals that need to be met.

2. Expressive Leadership

Expressive leadership is about being visible and approachable. The leader will be very active in the community, especially when it comes to events like town hall meetings or charity work. They want employees to know who they are as a person and what they stand for so that everyone can understand their mission statement better.

This leadership style is best used in teams that are very close knit or where leadership is working on building a business culture. It’s also great for organizations like non-profits and social enterprises because it helps to create an emotional connection between leadership and employees.

Leaders who use this leadership style tend to be more open at work, but they may not be as effective when it comes to making difficult decisions.

This leadership style is great for employees who need a lot of support and encouragement from leadership, but may not be ideal when it comes to achieving business goals.

3. Amiable Leadership

This leadership style is best used in employees who are more focused on personal connections. Amiable leadership typically sees the leader building a close bond with their team members and this helps them to be effective at communicating what needs to get done.

Leadership that utilizes amiable leadership may have some difficulty when it comes to difficult decisions because they don’t want to let their teammates down. They do not like conflict and will avoid it at all costs which can create leadership challenges when the team needs a leader who is more direct with their approach.

Amiable leadership typically results in good employee engagement, but leadership may lack some focus on reaching company goals because they’re too busy trying to be friends with their employees.

This leadership style is best used in smaller teams where leadership can focus on the team dynamic more intensely, but it may not work as well when there are larger numbers of people involved. It’s also great for new businesses or organizations that have just started because they need to establish a connection with their audience first before anything else matters.

4. Analytical Leadership

This leadership style is great for leaders who need to be in complete control of their organization. Those using this leadership style tend to have a strong focus on data and will typically use numbers, metrics, and analytics to determine future plans an actions. They are very objective when it comes to making decisions that affect the team because they want everything done by the books.

Analytical leadership is best used for leadership teams who need to be efficient and effective when it comes to getting results. It’s also great if you have a lot of leadership turnover because this approach helps bridge the gap between new leaders coming in and the rest of leadership team effectively.

This leadership style can cause some issues with employees who don’t like to take risks or leadership who are too focused on achieving results. Leadership should also be careful not to become so objective that they lose the human touch, which can cause employees to feel alienated and disengaged.

Organizations with leadership teams consisting of larger numbers may want to avoid this leadership style because it doesn’t typically work well in leadership teams where there are many different leadership styles present.

This leadership style is best used in leadership that needs to be extremely efficient and effective when making decisions, but it may not work well with employees who need more interpersonal connection from their leadership team. It’s also great for companies or organizations that do not value emotional connections very much because they want to be efficient and effective above all else.

5. Driver Leadership

Those leadership who use this leadership style tend to be very tough, but they can also deliver great results. This leadership style is best used for larger teams or organizations where leadership needs to be aggressive and demanding in order to get things done on time. They value decisiveness above all else so they often do not like wasting their time with small talk.

Drivers leadership typically results in high employee engagement and they can be very effective at driving teams to achieve goals as quickly as possible, but leadership may also struggle with building relationships with their employees because of how demanding they are all the time.

It’s best for work environments or organizations that don’t value interpersonal connections or need efficiency above all else. It’s also great for leadership teams that need to be extremely efficient and effective when making decisions, but it may not work as well with leadership who don’t like conflict or those who are too passive in their approach.

This leadership style can cause some issues if employees feel exhausted and overworked all the time because they do not value breaks or downtime. It can also cause leadership to struggle with building relationships and friendships because leadership is always demanding instead of asking for help from their employees.

Leadership should be careful not to become too aggressive, which can result in confrontations that lead to leadership leaving the organization as a whole. This leadership style works best if you have strong leadership at all levels of the leadership team.

6. Stable Leadership

Stable leadership is for leadership who are extremely passive and do not like to get involved with the team at all. They typically retain authority over their employees, but they don’t tend to give out much praise or feedback because of how inactive they are when it comes to leadership decisions.

This leadership style tends to work best in situations where leadership is already very passive and leadership turnover is not high. It’s also best in work environments where leadership wants to keep the status quo, but it can make leadership feel like they are missing out on great opportunities for growth within their organization.

Stable leadership typically means that leadership will be disengaged with most of their employees at all times which can lead to leadership feeling lonely, but it also means that leadership will have fewer problems with employees being passive aggressive all the time.

Leadership should be careful not to become too disengaged from their team members because they need to know when conflict arises so they can address issues before leadership becomes a problem in itself. They must also make sure leadership stays connected to leadership team members because leadership needs to know when they are not performing up to par.

If leadership is too passive, it can lead to leadership feeling lonely all the time which could impact their own health and well-being in general. This style works best for leadership who wants a very stable work environment where things don’t change often or at all.

Leadership Styles in a Nutshell

Business leadership style is very important to leadership success. Leadership should always try new styles of leadership so leadership can see what works best for their teams and organization as a whole.

Related: